Summary :
Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO, what are their differences? Which one is better for you? This post will demonstrate some differences between Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO? In addition, an SSD upgrade tool from MiniTool will be shown.
Quick Navigation :
Lvlkey: 29.57% OFF Discount Code For All Software: STH30 Windows 10 Professional OEM Key $11.10 https://bit.ly.
Samsung 1TB 970 EVO vs Samsung 1TB 970 EVO Plus Now that we’ve established that the Samsung 970 EVO Plus is the, ever-so-slightly, superior M.2 SSD in comparison to the Samsung 970 EVO, let’s see how it fares against Samsung’s higher end model: The Samsung 970 EVO Pro. In this test, the 860 Evo managed 524.5MB/s read and 496.3MB/s write. The 850 Evo, meanwhile, came in at 512.5MB/s read and 498.6MB/s write. Don’t get me wrong. Both sets of results are excellent, but it hardly puts the 860 Evo in a very good light when Samsung’s charging so much more for it, at least in the UK. Nov 27, 2018 The Samsung 860 QVO includes Intelligent TurboWrite technology, just like the 860 and 970 EVO models. This feature assigns a portion of the flash to run in SLC mode, thus creating a.
Overview of Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO SSDs
If you are trying to upgrade or replace a hard drive on your computer for getting better performance, almost the SSD is recommended. And now, there are various solid-state drives on the storage market, such as Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO, Samsung 970 EVO and so on.
Which SSD should you buy for your PC, Samsung 860 EVO vs 970 EVO? After reading this post, you know the difference between them and which to use.
With so many different solid-state drives on the market, Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO are the most popular ones. However, some users feel confused and they do not know which one is the better to choose. And, they wonder the differences between Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO. So, in the following section, we will introduce what they are and what their differences are.
Crucial MX500 SSD
The Crucial MX500 is the first Crucial’s drive based on Micron’s 64-layer 3D TLC NAND and it is the second generation of Crucial’s mainstream MX series to use TLC NAND rather than the MLC NAND. The Crucial MX500 SSD is available in both M.2 and 2.5 inch varieties, so one type or the other is installable in pretty much any modern PCs and laptops. The Crucial MX500 SSD is built on quality, speed and security that are backed by helpful service and support.
Besides, the Crucial MX500 SSD comes with four different capacities which are 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB.
Samsung 860 EVO SSD
Samsung 860 EVO is also one of the best selling SSDs in the world and it is designed to mainstream PCs and laptops. With the latest V-NAND and a robust algorithm-based controller, the Samsung 860 EVO SSD comes in a wide range of compatible form factors and capacities.
Samsung 860 EVO SSD comes in 5 available capacities which are 250GB, 500GB, 1000GB, 2000GB and 4000GB. So, many users would like to install Samsung 860 EVO SSD on their computer so as to get more disk space and better performance.
After knowing some simple information about Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO SSDs, we will show you some differences between Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO below.
Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO: Focus on 5 Aspects
In this part, we will show you some differences of MX500 vs 860 EVO. To learn more detailed information, keep on your reading.
1.Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO: Form Factor and Interface
In the first, we will look at the form factor of the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO SSDs.
The Crucial MX500 SSD is available in M.2 and 2.5-inch, and the Samsung 860 EVO SSD is available in M.2, 2.5-inch, and the mSATA. The interface of both Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO SSD is the SATA 6.0 GB/s.
What are the differences between 2.5 HDD and 3.5 HDD? This post shows some differences between these two hard drive form factors.
2. Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO: Capacity
When selecting an SSD, the capacity is an essential factor to be considered because the larger hard drive capacity enables you to save more files.
As for Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO, you can refer to the following chart.
Crucial MX500 | Samsung 860 EVO | |
Capacity | 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB |
From the above chart, you can know that the Samsung 860 EVO SSD provides more choices on hard drive capacity. You can choose either of them according to your actual needs.
3. Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO: Performance
The hard drive performance would be the most important factor to be considered when choosing the solid-state drives. As for the speed, we will compare Crucial MX500 1TB vs Samsung 860 EVO 1TB.
Crucial MX500 1TB | Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | |
Sequential Read | 560 MB/s | 550 MB/s |
Sequential Write | 510 MB/s | 520 MB/s |
Random Read | 95,000 IOPS | 97,000 IOPS |
Random Write | 90,000 IOPS | 88,000 IOPS |
As for the same capacity of the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO SSD, the sequential read speed of the Crucial MX500 1TB is litter faster than Samsung 860 EVO 1TB, but we think they are not much difference. Hence, if you want to improve the performance of the computer, you can choose to replace the traditional hard drive with these two solid-state drives, so that access time of computer will be reduced.
Of course, you can test the disk performance by yourself through the Disk Benchmark feature of MiniTool Partition Wizard.
860 Qvo Review
4. Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO: Warranty
As for Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO, we will show you the fourth perspective – Warranty. As a result, both of the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO SSDs provide a five-year limited warranty.
5. Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO: Price
Besides the solid-state drive specifications, the price would be taken into consideration when choosing a suitable SSD.
According to the official site of the Crucial and Samsung, the Crucial MX500 SSD 1TB is about $119.99 and the Samsung 860 EVO SSD 1TB is about $169.99. Of course, the prices of Crucial and Samsung SSD may verify due to the different solid-state drive capacities. For more prices of the different solid-state drive, you can visit their official site.
All in all, as for differences of Samsung 860 EVO vs Crucial MX500, this post has shown 5 aspects. Of course, there are some other differences of Crucial vs Samsung SSD, such as the Endurance, Controller, DRAM, memory and so on. If you don’t know whether Crucial MX500 SSD or Samsung 860 EVO SSD is suitable for you, you can consider the above factors. Besides the specifications of the solid-state drive, you also need to check the interface of your computer and choose the suitable SSDs.
In addition, both the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO SSD come with large storage size, thus enabling you to store lots of files, pictures, videos, movies, and so on. In general, SSD has better performance than the traditional hard drives, so you can choose to migrate data, file and even the operating system to the Crucial MX500 SSD or Samsung 860 EVO SSD without data loss.
However, do you know how to migrate the system from HDD to Crucial MX500 SSD or Samsung 860 EVO SSD without data loss?
How to Clone System from HDD to Crucial or Samsung SSD?
If you have gotten the Crucial MX500 SSD or the Samsung 860 EVO SSD, you may want to use it to replace the traditional hard drive so as to improve the performance of the computer. To do that, you can choose to migrate HDD from SSD.
To migrate the system and files from traditional hard drive to Crucial MX500 SSD or Samsung 860 EVO SSD without data loss, the clone tool is required. So, the professional SSD cloning software – MiniTool ShadowMaker is strongly recommended.
Besides, MiniTool ShadowMaker is also a piece of Windows backup software, allowing you to back up files, folders, disks, partitions, and the operating system.
To clone OS from HDD to SSD, MiniTool ShadowMaker is competent with the Clone Disk feature. And now, we will show you how to migrate the operating system to the Crucial MX500 or Samsung 860 EVO SSD.
1. Download MiniTool ShadowMaker from the following button, or you can choose to purchase an advanced one.
2. Install it and launch it.
3. Click Keep Trial.
4. Click Connect in This Computer to enter its main interface.
4. After entering the main interface of MiniTool ShadowMaker, go to the Tools page.
5. Then choose Clone Disk.
7. Next, click the Source module to choose the disk clone source. If you are trying to migrate OS to Crucial MX500 or Samsung 860 EVO SSD, select the original hard drive as the clone source. Then click Finish.
8. Click Destination Dragon ball xenoverse 2 cac ssj1-ssj4 transformation. module to choose the target disk. Here you need to select the Crucial MX500 or Samsung 860 EVO SSD as the target disk. Then click Finish.
9. Then you will receive a warning message which tells you that all data on the target disk will be destroyed during the disk cloning process. If there are important files on it, please back up them first.
10. Then the disk cloning process will begin. Please do not interrupt the cloning process until it is finished.
When the disk cloning process is finished, you will receive a warning message which tells you that the source disk and target disk have the same signature. If both of them are connected to your computer, either of them will be marked as offline. So, you need to remove or disconnect either of them. In addition, if you want to boot your computer from the target disk, please enter BIOS to change the boot sequence first.
When all steps are finished, you have successfully migrated the operating system from the traditional hard drive to the Crucial MX500 or Samsung 860 EVO SSD. After that, your computer performance may be improved.
Bottom Line
After reading this post, you may have a basic knowledge of the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 860 EVO SSD. And this post has introduced some differences of Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO, focusing on 5 aspects.
In addition, we also have introduced a clone tool for you to migrate OS from traditional hard drive to Crucial MX500 or Samsung 860 EVO SSD without data loss.
If you have any different opinion of Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO SSD and MiniTool ShadowMaker, you can leave a message in the comment zone or contact us via [email protected] and we will reply to you as soon as possible.
Samsung Qvo Vs Evo Difference
Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO FAQ
The Crucial MX500 SSD has a great performance for a SATA driver and a five-year warranty. The Crucial MX500 SSD also comes with large storage capacity, allowing you to save lots of files, photos, documents, videos, etc. Users can choose any one based on their actual needs.
What is the difference between Crucial MX500 and BX500?
The differences between Crucial MX500 and BX500 are the form factor, available capacities, price, release date and the Controller. For more detailed differences, you can visit the official site of Crucial.
The age of an SSD has proven to be a valuable determinate in its performance and longevity. And current SSD has been estimated that it can last for about 10 years, though the average SSD lifespan is shorter. It may depend on the actual situations.
You can have 2 SSD drives. In fact, you can have as many drives as your motherboard is able to connect to, including any combination of SSD and HDDs. The only problem is that capacity beyond 2TB is not usable if it adopts the MBR partitioning scheme.
Samsung may not be the first to release a QLC SSD, but the 860 QVO is the first mainstream SATA drive to try and deliver on the promise of high-capacity solid state drives at a price to rival large scale spinning platter storage. It was Intel who blinked first, releasing its 660p NVMe drive into the market, but this is the first standard QLC SSD we’ve plumbed into our test rig.
What is this QLC stuff anyways? Well, if we actually start referring to it as Samsung does it becomes a little more obvious… 4-bit MLC is how the Korean SSD giant denotes the latest NAND technology. QLC, or 4-bit MLC, is essentially a method of increasing the capacity of a NAND chip in the same physical space. It does this by allowing the memory to store more bits in each cell.
Being able to store four bits per cell, as opposed to three bits in TLC; two bits in traditional MLC; and just a single bit in SLC, does boost the available storage, but it also comes with its own share of downsides.
The first thing is that it is inevitably slower than any other kind of NAND, partly because it needs to spend more time making sure that it is reading and writing with the same level of precision. QLC memory controllers need to be damned good at error correction. The other issue is that QLC NAND has a lower endurance rating than its forebears too, which is a struggle when most of the key features of new SATA drives from the last couple of years have surrounded their increased reliability.
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB | Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | Crucial MX500 1TB | |
Controller | Samsung MJX | Samsung MJX | SiliconMotion SM2258 |
NAND | Samsung 4-bit MLC V-NAND | Samsung 3-bit MLC V-NAND | Micron 64-layer TLC 3D NAND |
DRAM cache | 1GB LPDDR4 | 1GB LPDDR4 | 1GB DDR3 |
Sequential read | 550MB/s | 550MB/s | 560MB/s |
Sequential write [after SLC] | 520MB/s [80MB/s] | 520MB/s [500MB/s] | 510MB/s |
TBW | 360TB | 600TB | 360TB |
Warranty | 3 years | 5 years | 5 years |
Price | £137 | £170 | £136 |
But these are all issues we had when 3-bit MLC, or triple-level cell (TLC), NAND was first introduced to the market. It was always held as a far slower entity – hence why Samsung continued to create its Pro drives using 2-bit MLC and its EVO range with 3-bit MLC – and was damned for its lower endurance. Over the years, however, TLC’s performance shortfall has largely been mitigated by ever-smarter SLC caches and the advances in memory manufacturing has improved the endurance levels beyond what any normal PC gamer could need.
If you look at the mighty Samsung 860 EVO it’s offering a 5 year or 600TB total bytes written (TBW) warranty, and can deliver general SSD performance easily on a par with its more expensive 860 Pro brethren.
And pretty much all the ways SSD manufacturers can mitigate the issues with TLC they can re-target to deal with QLC. That’s why this Samsung 860 QVO is, to all intents and purposes, identical to the 860 EVO besides its use of Samsung 4-bit MLC V-NAND. It uses the same MJX controller, the same 1GB LPDDR4 DRAM cache, and the same smart TurboWrite SLC cache technology.
What that also means is that the overall performance of the Samsung 860 QVO 1TB drive is incredibly close to the 860 EVO. In terms of the sequential read/write performance the ATTO pace of the QVO actually outstrips its TLC-based sibling. It also manages to post higher write performance in the incompressible AS SSD benchmarks, though does display slower read speeds than the EVO. It’s also a little off the pace when it comes to the 4k random read/write performance too, but not by enough that those results alone would put you off using it as the boot drive for your next gaming rig.
What might do, however, is the actual real-world performance of the Samsung 860 QVO. Its 5GB folder compression performance is right up there with the best, but when we copy a 30GB folder of mixed file types we saw the slowest performance since Crucial’s ropey BX200 or OCZ’s Trion drive.
Realistically, however, the 30GB folder write shouldn’t have taken up the total TurboWrite space designed to mitigate the slow speed of QLC memory. The SLC cache used since the 860 EVO provides 6GB of static SLC as a constant cache allocation, but if constant, or directly consecutive, write operations exceed that – and there is spare capacity – the drive is able to apportion up to an extra 36GB for a total TurboWrite cache of 42GB. On the 2TB and 4TB versions that goes up to 78GB.
So our standard large scale transfer shouldn’t have caused it such problems, but as the write operation continued into its sixth minute we could see the performance of the drive crawl. That’s because away from the SLC cache the 4-bit MLC has a rated sequential write performance which drops from 520MB/s to 80MB/s. The 3-bit MLC on the 1TB 860 EVO, on the other hand, drops down from 550MB/s to 500MB/s; a barely noticeable drop in pace.
Though none of that would be a problem if the Samsung 860 QVO drive was any cheaper than it is. At launch we’re looking at a 1TB SSD that costs £137, while the same capacity EVO drive is only a little more at £170. Admittedly that is far lower than at its own launch earlier this year, where it cost over £250. But right now that’s still the 1TB option from Samsung I’d recommend, though the £136Crucial MX500 is also a mighty tempting option with its own Micron TLC 3D NAND, but with lower endurance.
This is my main issue with this first-gen QLC SSD. The big thing for the new NAND tech is that it is supposed to be cheaper than TLC, which should help mitigate the performance and endurance shortfalls inherent in the memory design. But if you can buy solid, reliable, faster TLC SSDs for around the same price, at the same capacity, what is QLC really offering?
But, as I say, this is the first generation of a new memory technology, and Intel’s NVMe-based 660p shows the tech has some pacey legs when paired with a high-speed PCIe interface. And, when you look at the drop in price the 860 EVO has had since the price of NAND has started to dip again, it’s possible to see a time where the 860 QVO becomes a no-brainer for extra SSD storage capacity.
Though maybe not necessarily as a boot drive. While the overall amount of writes the 860 QVO is rated at – 329GB/s per day – is the same as the total writes over time for the 860 EVO, the expectation is that at that level of effort the QLC-based drive might be on its knees in three years where the EVO could last five years. Obviously if you’re writing 329GB/s per day then you’ve got storage problems more intricate than which NAND tech you need, but it is indicative of a higher level of trust in the EVO than in the longevity of the QVO. And with all the grunt work your OS drive does on a daily basis you’re going to want the more reliable SSD for that.
But these are the same issues TLC had when it first reared its head, and that has turned out to be the most successful consumer SSD tech around – subsequently achieving far higher endurance levels than any PC gamer is likely to need. So while we’re not falling over ourselves because of Samsung’s 4-bit MLC just yet, that could quickly change as prices drop on QLC NAND and new QLC memory controllers raise performance and boost endurance.
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
The Samsung 860 QVO could be an important, affordable SSD of the future. But right now there are better, faster TLC drives on the market, at the same capacity and around the same price, that we’d have to recommend over a QLC SSD.